what I'm saying we are right and there's more .........
M it sure I will not write anything on the Internet, which is not evidence and that's for sure.
I've said that many ex-clients still do not get their property .
Here is an example !
to process
30th December 2009
Heidi G. - the woman for the rough?
If the employee's wife Heidi G. for the rough in the therapeutic community Wilsche break? As on 5 September in Lüneburg alumni met at a coffee shop, she turned the second floor of an apartment outside photos of the participants, even eleven, banishing them to disk. A complaint against this action came to nothing. Justification: With the photos no suffered financially.
Now the name of this employee appears in an insurance company instead of an oath. Background: The head of the institution denies a temporary injunction that he would take things from private patients and patients themselves. He added, almost to the day two years ago in a letter (to me) is confirmed to a family court judge, but now is no longer correct.
true but also insured that former. It has the therapeutic community Wilsche break his court-recoverable claims to leave without his passport, and without his jewelry. He repeatedly called for the publication. Finally, it should be Proposal have been: "I come over and pick up my personal things." Heidrun G. is to have replied in writing: "If you come here just like that, we see this as trespassing." That's why it chose not to return
0 comments:
Post a Comment