photo: Tjaden Landgericht Hamburg, Sievekingplatz 1
20th April, 12 clock
Ruthard Stachowske against Heike Lemet
opposition proceedings injunction
report here
Update: have been challenge for bias
judge to rule on challenge for bias
bias claim rejected
Stachowske wants the Trial
20th April, 12.15 clock, Ruthard Stachowske against Heinz-Peter Tjaden
opposition proceedings for an injunction against opposition
Säunisurteil inserted
report here
Update: have been challenge for bias
opposition filed
judge position to challenge for bias taken
rejected challenge for bias
With final letter Stachowske lawyer wants to end the matter
immediate appeal against refusal of the application bias
appeal rejected
20th April, 13.30 clock, Ruthard Stachowske against Heike Lemet
opposition proceedings for injunction
report here
Current Status: Application made partiality
judges have refused to challenge for bias position taken
challenge for bias
Stachowske wants the trial
4th May 2010, 13:30
first clock earlier date
written preliminary
Youth Services Lüneburg (employer of Ruthard Stachowske) against Sajonara
date moved to 11 May 2010
date 11 May 2010 in the information a court observer again deleted
process ends with a comparison of the two Sides have agreed not to disclose.
administrative proceedings
Ruthard Stachowske against Heinz-Peter Tjaden
Based on a insurance under oath an employee of the lawyer Ruthard Stachowske
first October, 11 clock
conciliation and first used to date, action surf Youth Services Lüneburg against Tjaden
Written Pre-Trial, Ruthard Stachowske against Tjaden
written preliminary Ruthard Stachowske against Heike Lemet
Thus, in the legal wave of the therapeutic community Wilsche break to courthouse .
The announcement of further Schedule follows.
All dates of 30 March 2010, at the request of the opposing attorney on the 20th April has been folded 2010th These dates are now.
background info Psycho expert
What actually is an original?
The available trial before the Hamburg District Court, the attorney of Ruthard Stachowske has presented two further submissions. Which were handed to the judge and our lawyer. One of the submissions contained a copy of a handover protocol. The original was the attorney of Stachowske present. Heike Lemet played at once, to have signed this protocol ever.
So they called after the negotiations insight into the original. For this purpose, it proposed a meeting in which Stachowske attorney would have the original in their book. To this request, the lawyer responded by sending another copy of this transfer protocol. For this he calculated eleven euro.
0 comments:
Post a Comment